🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of eleven justices. The judicial body also overturned a previous decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running legal battle over whether the former president has the legal right and valid reason to send state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while local authorities assert that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city enacted two legal injunctions this month – one blocking the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any military personnel in the state, after attempts to evade the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling shows that facts are important and that the courts are striving to ensure government responsibility. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the armed forces into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”